Integrated health &amp; financial benefits system and method

ABSTRACT

A medical shared savings unit receives a selection from one or more computing devices to select a medical provider in a region outside the United States for a patient as part of a medical savings plan, and accesses the medical plan information from the data store, and calculates a savings based on a difference between a cost of the medical procedure performed in the region outside the United States and a cost of the medical procedure performed within the United States. The medical shared savings unit further divides the savings between the insurer and the employer based on a medical savings plan model when the patient undergoes the medical procedure in the region outside the United States.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The current application is a continuation of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/483,027, filed May 29, 2012, entitled, “Integrated Health And Financial Benefits System And Method;” which in turn claims priority to and is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/196,790, filed on Aug. 2, 2011 and entitled “Satori Integrated Health & Financial Benefits System And Method,” now U.S. Pat. No. 8,224,668; which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/172,941, filed on Jul. 14, 2008 and entitled “Satori Integrated Health & Financial Benefits System And Method,” now U.S. Pat. No. 8,160,897. This application is also related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/448,272, filed Apr. 16, 2012, entitled “Satori Integrated Health & Financial Benefits System and Method,” now U.S. Pat. No. 8,457,986; which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/172,941, filed on Jul. 14, 2008 and entitled “Satori Integrated Health & Financial Benefits System And Method,” now U.S. Pat. No. 8,160,897. Each of the aforementioned patents and patent applications are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entireties.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The system and method relate generally to a medical shared savings system and method.

BACKGROUND

By several measures, health care spending continues to rise at the fastest rate in our history. Annual expenditures for health care in the United States have been rising at an astonishing 2 to 5 times the inflation rate since 2000. These increases translate into excessive and rapidly escalating health insurance costs for businesses, as well as, individuals. Over a 5 year period, employers have experienced double digit increases in health plan premiums and, due to price sensitivity, companies attempt to reduce costs annually by changing their healthcare coverage. This disruption of service flow has a dramatic affect on many insurance companies' margins. As costs continue to surge, employers are now faced with many economic challenges and are either unable to or opt not to absorb the higher medical costs. Employees now must face increases in personal contributions to their health plan while millions of others are left without any health insurance coverage at all simply because many employers cannot afford to provide them with medical benefits. In other instances, employees must make the difficult choice as to which members in the family they can afford to insure. For those employers struggling with escalating premiums, price has now become the key selection criteria over provider network and actual benefits. The employer contribution to the average annual premium for a family of 4 reached $12,100 in 2007 and is projected to increase 60% by 2012.

These extraordinary health care cost increases have severely affected multiple segments of our economy and have had a dramatic impact on the ability of US businesses to compete in world markets. One very recent example was the sale of Chrysler® to Cerberus Capital®. Essentially, Chrysler® was sold for with the assumption of its healthcare liability for retirees which was estimated to total $15.7 billion. What is interesting to note is that Daimler-Benz® bought the company less than a decade ago for $60 billion.

Health care costs have increased since 2000 at a rate that is 4 times faster than wage growth. These increases impact many companies ability to increase their workforce resulting in a decelerated job growth market. These costs also suppress many companies' abilities to increase wages for current workers due to the huge increases in employee total compensation costs which include the health care costs. Furthermore, many businesses find it difficult to provide health coverage for employees, and retirees. Thus, by cutting into a company's operating margin, health care costs are reducing their ability to grow by investing in research, capital spending, product development, and marketing with the end result being an inability to compete effectively in world markets. A perfect example can be found in a recent report published by Starbucks® which confirmed that in the last 12 months, their expenditures on health insurance alone surpassed their total costs for raw materials needed to produce the coffee they sell. As another example, General Motors® spends $1500 in health care costs for every car and truck that is produced. This means that the health care expense is more than the cost for the steel used in their car and truck production.

In addition, the wage earnings of workers has been severely affected by rising insurance costs (and premiums) because, for example, many employers have been forced to pass on these premium increases to their workers. Various experts report that the average employee contribution to company-provided health insurance has increased more than 143% in the last 7 years. Currently, an employee, on average, pays 27% of their health insurance premium. Based on this figure, employees are paying $3500 annually for just the premium which does not include co-pays, deductibles, or any other co-insurance. As a consequence of this, the situation exists where even when an employer offers insurance coverage, many employees opt out of the plan because they cannot afford their share of the contribution. Ironically, here in Southern California, some people cross the border into Mexico and pay cash for their healthcare. Thus, while salaries have increased 15% since 2000, average out-of-pocket healthcare expenses have increased 115%. Furthermore, there has been a dramatic increase in the employee responsibility for the cost of healthcare insurance through higher co-pays, deductibles, and cost sharing percentages of the premium.

The continuously rising health care costs in America have potentially adverse consequences for its citizens. Many Americans report that health care is their number one economic concern and the effects of healthcare on their financial stability are already taking place. The Commonwealth Fund reports that an estimated 77 million Americans age 19 and older (2 in 5 adults) have difficulty paying medical bills and have accrued medical debt. Over two-thirds of these families (with medical problems) have health insurance coverage. In a recent study by Harvard University, investigators found that 50% of all bankruptcy filings were partly the result of medical expenses. Experts have also recently reported that 25% of Americans have experienced housing problems, such as the inability to make rent or mortgage payments, due to medical debt. The Urban Institute has projected continued increases in out-of-pocket (co-pays, deductibles, and employee portion of the healthcare premium) healthcare costs. They estimate that in 2030, out-of-pocket healthcare costs will take 30.3% of after-tax income for older unmarried adults up from 17.3% in 2000. Unfortunately, these trends are more than likely to continue unless both businesses and individuals are presented with real options to accessible and affordable health care choices that can not only relieve costly medical burdens but also provide for real financial protection and stability.

It is widely known that the United States spends more money by a significant multiple on medical care than any other advanced industrialized country in the world. Despite the healthcare spending in this country, quality as measured by life expectancy is not as high as it exists in many other developed countries. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), World Health Statistics, 2006, the United States ranks 26 in Life Expectancy at Birth, for Males. While an age of 75 would appear to be excellent, countries such as Canada, Great Britain, Spain, Italy, Australia, Austria, France, Germany, Greece, Israel, Singapore, and others have a much higher life expectancy. Very surprisingly, Cuba, Costa Rica, Ireland, and Finland are comparable to the United States.

The issue is, if the overall health of the population of the United States is not in line with the dollars that we spend (i.e. the notion that if we are outspending other nations by 4 to 5 times on healthcare) then our healthcare (life expectancy) should be better by some significant factor. Therefore, since this is not the case, then there must be health care being delivered outside of the United States that can be utilized at significantly less costs and have equal or better results. The United States' system of health care is burdened with waste, unnecessary redundancies, litigation, bureaucracy, bloat, and a higher cost (standard) of living than other countries providing comparable quality services. It is clear from this data that there are fundamental, deep rooted problems in the U.S. healthcare system that either cannot or will not be solved easily or in a foreseeable period of time. None of the various 2008 election initiatives address the flaws in the system, other than how to provide healthcare coverage for 47 million uninsured Americans.

Medical Travel/Medical Tourism

Over the last few years, in response to more and more American's either losing healthcare coverage and/or anticipating large medical expenses following a diagnosis, a cottage industry has evolved catering to these individuals, under the banner of Medical Tourism. Medical Tourism or Medical Travel is where healthcare services are sought out and delivered outside of the home country of the patient. In other words, medical travel is the act of traveling to other countries to obtain medical, dental, or surgical care. The term was originally coined by the media as a catch all phrase to describe a rapidly growing industry where people travel to obtain medical care, but spend additional time in the host country recuperating and having leisure time post medical procedure.

A combination of factors have led to an increase in popularity of medical travel; the high cost of healthcare in the United States, the ease and affordability of international travel, significant improvements in technology, physician training, certification of hospitals, internet connection capability that connects the patient overseas with family members at home, and overall quantum improvements in the standard of care in many overseas countries.

According to research by the University of Delaware “The cost of surgery in Bolivia, Argentina, India, Thailand, Colombia, Philippines or South Africa can be one-tenth of what it is in the United States or Western Europe, and sometimes even less. A heart-valve replacement that would cost US $200,000 or more in the U.S., for example, goes for $10,000 in the Philippines and India—and that includes round-trip airfare and a brief vacation package which also includes costs for travel and lodging for a companion. Similarly, a metal-free dental bridge worth $5,500 in the U.S. costs $500 in India or Bolivia and only $200 in the Philippines, a knee replacement in Thailand with six days of Physical Therapy costs about one-fifth of what it would in the States, and Lasik Eye Surgery worth $3,700 in the U.S. is available in many countries for $730. Cosmetic surgery savings are even greater. A full facelift that would cost $20,000 in the U.S. runs about $2,700 in the Philippines or $2,500 in South America or $2,300 in Bolivia.” FIG. 1 shows the difference in cost of different medical procedures in the United States (shown as the retail price), India, Thailand, and Singapore.

Thus, it is necessary to provide a patient medical savings sharing system that not only overcomes the problems associated with rising healthcare costs but also takes advantage of the medical travel/medical tourism phenomenon and it is to this end that the system and method are directed.

SUMMARY

In one aspect, a medical shared savings system includes a data store that stores medical plan information for a medical plan associated with a patient and an employer. The medical plan information includes pricing data for a medical procedure for each of a number of medical providers in a medical plan network associated with the medical plan. The medical providers includes at least one medical provider in a region outside of the fifty United States, which region outside the fifty United States can also include American territories, foreign countries and territories, and other regions. The medical plan has an associated established medical premium to be paid to an insurer.

A medical shared savings unit is connected with the data store and interacts with one or more computing devices via a communications network. The medical shared savings unit receives a selection from one of the one or more computing devices to select a medical provider in a region outside of the United States for a patient as part of a medical savings plan associated with the medical plan. The medical shared savings unit accesses the medical plan information from the data store, and calculates a savings based on a difference between a cost of the medical procedure performed in the region outside of the United States and a cost of the medical procedure performed within the United States. The medical shared savings unit further divides the savings between the insurer and the employer based on a medical savings plan model when the patient undergoes the medical procedure in the region outside of the United States, the savings being in the form of a lower medical premium that is lower than the established medical premium. In alternative implementations, the medical shared savings unit executes the medical shared savings model to divide the savings.

Implementations of the current subject matter can include, but are not limited to, systems and methods consistent including one or more features are described as well as articles that comprise a tangibly embodied machine-readable medium operable to cause one or more machines (e.g., computers, etc.) to result in operations described herein. Similarly, computer systems are also described that may include one or more processors and one or more memories coupled to the one or more processors. A memory, which can include a computer-readable storage medium, may include, encode, store, or the like one or more programs that cause one or more processors to perform one or more of the operations described herein. Computer implemented methods consistent with one or more implementations of the current subject matter can be implemented by one or more data processors residing in a single computing system or multiple computing systems. Such multiple computing systems can be connected and can exchange data and/or commands or other instructions or the like via one or more connections, including but not limited to a connection over a network (e.g. the Internet, a wireless wide area network, a local area network, a wide area network, a wired network, or the like), via a direct connection between one or more of the multiple computing systems, etc.

The details of one or more variations of the subject matter described herein are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features and advantages of the subject matter described herein will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims. While certain features of the currently disclosed subject matter are described for illustrative purposes in relation to an enterprise resource software system or other business software solution or architecture, it should be readily understood that such features are not intended to be limiting. The claims that follow this disclosure are intended to define the scope of the protected subject matter.

DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, show certain aspects of the subject matter disclosed herein and, together with the description, help explain some of the principles associated with the disclosed implementations. In the drawings,

FIG. 1 is a chart that compares the cost for a number of medical procedures in selected countries;

FIG. 2A illustrates a medical shared savings system;

FIG. 2B illustrates more details of the patient portal of the medical shared savings system;

FIG. 2C illustrates more details of the payor portal of the medical shared savings system;

FIG. 2D illustrates more details of the employer portal of the medical shared savings system; and

FIG. 3 is a flowchart of a method for the calculation of the dollars that will be saved.

When practical, similar reference numbers denote similar structures, features, or elements.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The system and method are particularly applicable to the Satori® Integrated Health & Financial Benefits System implemented as shown in the diagrams and it is in this context that the system and method will be described. In one implementation, Satori® Integrated Health & Financial Benefits System may be implemented over the web as will be enabled at www.satoriworldmedical.com, but the system and method are not limited to the implementation of the system as shown at that site. It will be appreciated, however, that the system and method has greater utility since the system and method can be implemented in other manners, with other architectures, etc. that are within the scope of the disclosure.

The system and method for Satori® Integrated Health & Financial Benefits System shares the savings attributable to the patient selecting a necessary medical procedure when the medical/dental procedure is performed outside of the United States. The savings is shared between the health insurer/employer and the patient. Various embodiment of the system are described below that can be used by including but not limited to by self-funded employers, Health Maintenance Organizations (HMO's), Medicare/Medicaid/MediCal organizations, Preferred Provider Organizations (PPO's), pension plans (healthcare liability), municipalities, unions, worker's compensation carriers, and the like.

FIG. 2A illustrates the Satori® Integrated Health & Financial Benefits System 100 that includes one or more user computing devices 102, such as one or more patient computing devices 102 a, one or more payor computing devices 102 b and one or more employer computing devices 103 c as shown in FIG. 2A. Each computing device may be a processing unit based device with sufficient memory, display capabilities, and connectivity to interact with a medical expense unit 106. For example, each computing device may be a personal computer, a laptop computer, a tablet computer, a cellular phone, a smart phone, a PDA and the like. Each computing device 102 may be capable of connecting with a link 104 wherein the link may be a computer network, a communications network, a wired network or a wireless network. In one embodiment, the link 104 may be the Internet. The link 104 allows each computing device 102 to interact with the medical expense unit 106. In one embodiment, the medical expense unit 106 may be one or more server computers that allow a connection to the computing devices 102 and serve information and content to the computing devices such as using a web server that serves web pages that are displayed on a browser application that is being executed by a processing unit of each computing device. The medical expense unit 106 and the computing devices 102 may also interact with each other in other manners that are within the scope of the Satori® Integrated Health & Financial Benefits System.

The system may also include a store 108 that stores information associated with the system such as, for example, medical claims data, cost per procedure data, patient data, payor data, employer data, physician data, hospital accreditation data, technical medical procedure data and the like. The patient data may include for each patient, for example, demographics, contact information, diagnosis and procedure data, insurance data, travel itinerary information, and more. The payor data may include, for example, account information, claims data including history, cost for procedure, mortality and morbidity rate, outcomes data, and the like, as well as, subscriber data. The employer data may include, for example, coverage data, hospital data such as inpatient and outpatient facility information, claims history, information systems utilized, physician and nurse data, and the like. The physician data may include, for example, biographies, CVs, licensing and credentials, language capacity, quality data including outcomes, and the like. The hospital data may include accreditation data for example, standards and evaluation methods including assessment and care processes, education, management of information and human resources, quality leadership, infection control, blood handling processes, facility equipment and technology, recording handling, patient privacy, hospital transport services, diagnostic capabilities, patient communication procedures, collaborative integrated management, compliance, and the like. The medical procedure data may include information about various medical procedures, such as for example, cardiac procedures, orthopedic procedures, spine procedures, cancer procedures, vascular procedures, cosmetic procedures, dental procedures, urology procedures, addiction therapy, women's health procedures including fertility, cancer, bariatric surgery, general surgery, stem-cell therapies, neurosurgery, living donor transplants, and others. The store 108 also may include safety data, pricing data, travel data, such air and ground transportation, hotel accommodations, and the like. The store 108 may further include country data, such as capital, location, maps, climate, languages, economic factors, currency, communication, transportation, and the like, and media information such as articles, press releases, and the like. In one implementation, the medical expense unit 106 may further include, as shown in FIG. 2A, a patient portal 110, a payor portal 112 and an employer portal 114 wherein each portal may be one or more server computers that execute computer code to implement the operations of each of the portals.

FIG. 2B illustrates more details of an implementation of the patient portal 110. The patient portal may be implemented using one or more server computers that execute computer code as described above. The patient portal may include a patient portal web server 110A (which may be implemented as a software based commercially available web server) that interacts with the one or more patient computing devices 102 a (as shown in FIG. 1) to establish TCP/IP connections with these patient computing devices and to exchange data/information with these one or more patient computing devices. In one implementation, the information/data may be exchanged using web pages and forms in web pages. The patient portal may also include a patient portal management unit 110B and a patient portal store 110C wherein the patient portal store stores information associated with the patient portal and the patient portal management unit manages the patient portal store and interacts with the web server as shown. In one implementation, the patient portal management unit is a plurality of lines of computer code being executed by one or more patient portal processing units that are part of the one or more server computers and the store is a software implemented relational database system. Thus, the patient portal 110 may provide a new patient or returning patient (a person who needs to have a medical procedure performed) with information about how to save money with the system, how to derive an economic benefit with the system, instructions to register for the system, process of utilizing the system, information about medical procedures outside of the United States, information regarding our network of hospitals, physicians, and other affiliates, information on how to use the system, the benefits of utilizing the system, etc.

FIG. 2C illustrates more details of an implementation of the payor portal 112. The payor portal may be implemented using one or more server computers that execute computer code as described above. The payor portal may include a payor portal web server 112A (which may be implemented as a software based commercially available web server) that interacts with the one or more payor computing devices 102 b (as shown in FIG. 1) to establish TCP/IP connections with these payor computing devices and to exchange data/information with these one or more payor computing devices. In one implementation, the information/data may be exchanged using web pages and forms in web pages. The payor portal may also include a payor portal management unit 112B and a payor portal store 112C wherein the payor portal store stores information associated with the payor portal and the payor portal management unit manages the payor portal store and interacts with the web server as shown. In one implementation, the payor portal management unit is a plurality of lines of computer code being executed by one or more payor portal processing units that are part of the one or more server computers and the store is a software implemented relational database system. Thus, the payor portal 112 may provide a payor (an organization who is going to pay for the medical expense) with information about the system and its operations, registration information, benefits of utilizing the Satori Integrated Health & Financial Benefits System such as the amount of dollars that the organization would save by utilizing the Satori Global Network™. Additionally it would reflect improved operating margin, provider network, competency of network, quality indicators, an increase in payor's marketplace advantage, and the like.

FIG. 2D illustrates more details of an implementation of the employer portal 114. The employer portal may be implemented using one or more server computers that execute computer code as described above. The employer portal may include an employer portal web server 114A (which may be implemented as a software based commercially available web server) that interacts with the one or more employer computing devices 102 c (as shown in FIG. 1) to establish TCP/IP connections with these employer computing devices and to exchange data/information with these one or more employer computing devices. In one implementation, the information/data may be exchanged using web pages and forms in web pages. The employer portal may also include an employer portal management unit 114B and an employer portal store 114C wherein the employer portal store stores information associated with the employer portal and the employer portal management unit manages the employer portal store and interacts with the web server as shown. In one implementation, the employer portal management unit is a plurality of lines of computer code being executed by one or more employer portal processing units that are part of the one or more server computers and the store is a software implemented relational database system. Thus, the employer portal 114 may provide the employer (an entity or individual who employs the patient) with information about the system and its operations, registration information, benefits of utilizing the Satori® Integrated Health & Financial Benefits System including a reduction in operational costs yielding an increase in profits for the potential for additional investment in marketing, expansion, research, capital spending, product development, and more, an increase in employee productivity enhancement, retention, and reduction of absenteeism due to the ease of accessibility to affordable procedures through the Satori Global Network™, eliminating the employee's delay of procedures due to their personal, large out-of-pocket costs. Through the utilization of the Health Reimbursement Account the employer will be able to give their employees access to high-quality care and still receive 100% of the benefit through the tax deduction even though they will be sharing a percentage of the savings with the employee. This for the first time, by utilizing the Health Reimbursement Account, provides a vehicle for the patient to receive an economic benefit for choosing a less costly alternative treatment, but receiving high quality care.

FIG. 3 is a flowchart of a method for the Satori® Integrated Health & Financial Benefits System 120. Following the overall description of the medical shared savings method, particular examples of different employers and how they can use the system and method will be provided. In the method 120, a patient needs a medical procedure (122). The patient then decides whether or not to use the Satori® Integrated Health & Financial Benefits System (124). If the patient does not use the Satori system, he/she pays the full cost with co-pays, co-insurance, and deductibles (126). If the patient elects to use the Satori® system, the patient selects the Satori Global Network™ of hospital and physician providers outside of the United States (128) (an overseas medical procedure not performed in the United States by an overseas medical provider) and the procedures occur outside of the United States and the patient returns to the United States when they have recovered and have been discharged from the care of the overseas physician (130). The non-US performed medical procedure will also include within the surgical procedure costs, all necessary post-operative medical follow-up care delivered outside the United States, e.g. Physical Therapy. In addition, due to the uniqueness of the model utilizing a Health Reimbursement Account, ongoing prescription, medical premium, and other expenses are paid for by the savings generated by having the procedure done internationally, by the system. The savings due to the medical procedure being performed outside of the United States (See FIG. 1 for an example of the cost differences between a US procedure and the same procedure in other foreign countries) is then shared with the patient (132) so that the employer, payor, and patient all receive some economic benefit (share the savings) from the medical procedure being performed outside of the United States.

The Satori® Integrated Health & Financial Benefits System includes interactive capabilities which allow users to interface with our database(s) in a number of different ways. The patient user menu is comprised of categories which include various medical procedures; US retail pricing, employer/financial sponsor costs, insurer costs, patient costs such as deductibles, co-pays, co-insurance, premiums, and more. The user is able to input personal information such as their selected procedure, employer/financial sponsor, health insurance carrier and their particular benefit plan, surgery destination country, and more, as well as, utilize drop down menus to analyze procedure costs, savings, and direct economic benefit. Once the information is entered and submitted, the software system then calculates the user's savings when selecting the Satori Global Network™ verses that of the US healthcare system, as well as, computes the actual financial benefit they will receive from the shared savings which will also include dollars saved from deductibles, co-pays, and co-insurances not being charged to the patient by utilizing the Satori Global Network™. The system displays the real dollar benefit received from their employer/financial sponsor due to the savings and upon the completion of the overseas surgical procedure the share of the savings are then deposited it into their employee's Health Reimbursement Account.

The employer/financial sponsor user menu is comprised of categories which include procedures; US retail pricing, employer/financial sponsor costs, insurer costs, patient costs such as deductibles, co-pays, co-insurance, premiums, and more. The user is able to input company information such as company size, demographics, employee personnel profiles, procedures, medical claims data including historical costs, health insurance carriers and benefit plans, premiums for employees and dependents, surgery destinations, and more, as well as, utilize drop down menus to analyze procedure costs and savings. Once the information is entered and submitted, the software system then calculates the user's savings when the employee selects the Satori Global Network™ verses that of the US healthcare system. The software system will calculate the real dollar financial benefit they will receive, as well as, calculate the shared portion that they will need to deposit into their employee's Health Reimbursement Account.

The insurer user menu is comprised of categories which include procedures; US retail pricing, employer/financial sponsor costs, insurer costs, patient costs such as deductibles, co-pays, co-insurance, premiums, and more. The user is able to input company information such as type of carrier, member/company, procedures, benefit plans, revenue received from members, surgery destinations, and more, as well as, utilize drop down menus to analyze procedure costs and savings. Once the information is entered and submitted, the software system then calculates the user's savings when the member selects the Satori Global Network™ verses that of the US healthcare system. The software system will calculate the real dollar financial benefit they will receive.

Health Reimbursement Account Embodiment

In one embodiment, the system may use a Health Reimbursement Account. Health Reimbursement Accounts or “personal care accounts,” are a type of health insurance plan that reimburses employees for qualified medical expenses. The U.S. Department of the Treasury issued guidance on health reimbursement accounts in a revenue ruling in June 2002.

Health Reimbursement Accounts consist of funds set aside by employers to reimburse employees for qualified medical expenses, just as an insurance plan will reimburse covered individuals for the cost of services incurred. The guidance provided by the Department of the Treasury makes it clear that Health Reimbursement Accounts are not a new type of account designated within the Internal Revenue Code. Rather, employers qualify for preferential tax treatment of funds placed in a Health Reimbursement Account in the same way that they qualify for tax advantages by funding an insurance plan because employers can deduct the cost of an insurance plan—and now a Health Reimbursement Account—as a business expense under Internal Revenue Code section 162.

Health Reimbursement Accounts are open to employees of companies of all sizes, unlike medical savings accounts that are only available for small business employees. A Health Reimbursement Account provides “first-dollar” medical coverage until funds are exhausted. For example, if an employee has a $500 qualifying medical expense, then the full amount will be covered by the Health Reimbursement Account if the funds are available in the account. Under a

Health Reimbursement Account, the employer provides the funds, not the employee. All unused funds are rolled over at the end of the year. Former employees, including retirees, can have continued access to unused reimbursement amounts if the employer allows this. Health Reimbursement Accounts remain with the originating employer and do not follow an employee to new employment, thereby providing an incentive for the employee not to change jobs.

Using the Satori® Integrated Health & Financial Benefits System described above, an employee, member, subscriber or a potential patient decides to seek care utilizing the Satori Global Network™. Since the medical care is at a substantial savings compared to traditional US medical care, real dollar savings are generated for the paying entity, as well as, the individual patient. Under the Satori model, for example the employer/sponsor keeps 75% of the savings (or any other percentage that the payor/sponsor chooses) and the patient receives (via a Health Reimbursement Account), 25% (or the difference between what the payor keeps and 100%) of the savings for which he or she is free to use for permitted health expenses under the Internal Revenue Code. This significant process improvement allows for both lowering an organization's health care costs, as well as, lowering of the patient's health care cost, which, through this method, is tax free to the patient. It has the potential to allow workers to pay for their healthcare premiums for several years along with any future co-pays, deductibles, and other co-insurance for other necessary medical care required. Overall, this process improvement provides for high quality medical care, lower healthcare costs for the business or sponsoring entity and a tax free health care fund that provides first dollar coverage, including premium payments for the employee/member/subscriber or patient with the potential to do so for several years.

In addition to the health reimbursement account, a medical savings account or health saving account may also be used.

The organizations that can benefit through this process (as the employer or payor) are: employers—large and small, unions, workers compensation carriers, pension plans/funds, employers that self-fund their health care expense, Third Party Administrators (TPAs), Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) and/or Preferred Provider Organizations (PPOs). An example of how the system and method works for each type of payor/employer is now provided.

Self-Funded Employers

Self funded companies directly retain the risk for medical expenses since they do not offload that risk to an insurer (Although they may purchase reinsurance for catastrophic claims.) The self funded companies typically utilize a TPA (Third Party Administrator) to be the administrative and medical management arm of their health offering. Typically, the TPA provides a network of contracted hospitals, physicians and ancillary care providers; adjudicates and pays claims; processes enrollments and disenrollments; and performs an array of utilization management functions such as large case management and disease management. The self funded employers typically represent about ⅓ of the employers with medical coverage in a community and represent 500 or more covered lives. The Satori® Integrated Health & Financial Benefits System and method would utilize a shared savings plan between employers and employees through a Health Reimbursement Account (HRA) mechanism.

Health Maintenance Organizations

HMOs are regulated by state authorities. HMOs generally must file changes to their benefit plans with state regulators who have the power to approve or challenge them. Regulators typically look favorably on benefit changes giving members additional choices and/or reduced cost (such as that provided by the Satori® Integrated Health & Financial Benefits System is and method described above.)

If a HMO participant were to sign up for the Satori Global Network™ as part of their HMO offering, we would, in concert with the HMO's legal department, craft incentives that would be consistent with state law and the HMO's approved benefit structure. There are several ways that these incentives could be crafted to include: 1) reduced premium for the company and employee making the Satori selection; 2) the HMO provides a premium rebate (or credit on future billings) to an employer for an employee utilizing the Satori service (after the procedure is performed) and then a comparable incentive plan for the employee could be implemented using a HRA; 3) co-payments and deductibles would be waived for procedure; and/or 4) 100% coverage with no out-of-pocket costs.

Preferred Provider Organizations

There are different incentives depending if the Satori® Integrated Health & Financial Benefits System is linked to an insured PPO or a PPO that simply offers provider networks for rent. In either case, the Satori® system would be a network provider, just like any other organization, and if a member/company selected Satori® for their network, the incentives could work in the same manner as an HMO as described above. If the medical shared savings system is part of a provider network PPO which bills the underwritten entity (an insurer or self funded employer), the incentives are easier to implement because the underwriter controls the benefits and structure; Satori® would simply be part of a “rent a network” structure, and therefore the method would be implemented using a Health Reimbursement Account.

Pension Plan (Healthcare Liability)

As these dollars are controlled via trust or defined plan, the medical shared savings incentives would need to be crafted consistent with the terms of the trust. These individuals are retirees (not yet Medicare eligible) and are not considered employees so a HRA is not available for use since the HRA is funded exclusively by the employer. However, there is the potential that the employer would establish the HRA as part of its structure in advance of a healthcare retiree becoming eligible for this coverage and therefore the embodiment using a HRA is available. A Medical Savings Account could, however, be established for any individual that would allow for payments of future healthcare expense wherein deposits could be made by sponsoring organization based on savings from utilizing the medical shared savings system. In addition, other incentives can be implemented in lieu of a Medical Savings Account if the Satori® Integrated Health & Financial Benefits System is used, such as no co-pays, no deductibles, and/or waiver of future premium contributions by recipient.

Municipalities

Some states (Colorado and Virginia) have introduced legislation permitting state employees to go outside the United States for health care. Furthermore, cities have a significant funding crisis for its retiree (too young to be Medicare eligible) healthcare liability and each one has a different program based on its own plan design. The Satori® Integrated Health & Financial Benefits System will provide a no out-of-pocket-cost incentive program for recipients so that anytime a plan participant selects the Satori® system, the recipient would have significantly reduced healthcare expenses going forward for several years.

Unions

Unions control the funding and benefit design of their trusts plans which creates a flexible environment for medical shared savings system incentives. For example, the savings generated from a member utilizing the Satori® Integrated Health & Financial Benefits System could be utilized to fund additional benefits, for example dental coverage, vision coverage or prescription drug coverage. If the Satori® system was used, incentives could include significantly reduced future premium funding by the member for several years, and/or waive co-payments, deductibles, and other co-insurance.

As shown above, regardless of the type of payer, the sponsoring organizations would understand that in order to utilize the Satori® Integrated Health & Financial Benefits System, they are required to share the savings with the member/recipient/beneficiary/patient. Whatever benefit the patient gets, the underwriter/sponsoring organization will get threefold or more; so there is no downside for including the Satori Global Network™ option. Since any contribution to a Health Reimbursement Account is tax deductible to the sponsor they still receive 100% of the savings, while creating a novel economic incentive for the individual to choose Satori.

Satori's shared savings model will provide the opportunity to make real and significant changes in the delivery of health care services to Americans. The unique and innovative approach empowers consumers, employers, and payors of health care services with the ability to make choices that will provide them with a direct tangible financial benefit. In this model, the consumer is at the center point of the decision process, but all the stakeholders will win by the consumer selecting the Satori Global Network™. For the first time ever, a medical shared savings system will provide real solutions to some of our biggest health care problems by aligning high quality and economic benefit for all the stakeholders. Businesses will utilize the system to reduce operational expenses and thus be given the financial opportunity to invest in employee retention, market expansion, market research, capital spending, product development, and marketing and also still have 100% of the savings. Additionally, businesses will be given more control over health care expenditures. Employees will, for the first time ever, receive a direct and tangible economic benefit from choosing the Satori Global Network™ option. Instead of being forced to make dramatic lifestyle changes, such as filing bankruptcy or foreclosing, due to the accrual of medical debt or not seeking medical care due to the high co-pay and deductibles, individuals now can avoid all of this with the protective financial blanket provided by the Satori Integrated Health & Financial Benefits System. The savings will be passed on directly to the consumer in a number of ways. Deductibles, co-pays, co-insurance portions will be waived. A portion of the savings between the costs of procedures in the US verses those in the Satori Global Network™ can be placed in a HRA, which is tax-free to the individual, and those deposited funds can be utilized to pay future premiums and other costs incurred by the subscriber which may last for several years. In essence, the Satori Integrated Health & Financial Benefits System and this method will provide individuals with economic security. Payors will also benefit through the opportunity to dramatically reduce their expenditures by offering their subscribers the Satori Global Network™ option. The Satori model is likely to reduce their customers need to change plans, thus saving them from excessive product development and delivery costs.

The Satori® Integrated Health & Financial Benefits System will be advantageous to all parties involved. This revolutionary model clearly will meet the demands of today's marketplace. By including the Satori® system and comparing its costs, benefits, and outcomes against those of US healthcare providers, those who pay the bills will have an important new tool for performance measurement. In essence, the Satori® system's value is in applying downward price pressure on the medical industry that has heretofore been isolated from the international pressures faced by virtually all other facets of the American economy. The Satori® Integrated Health & Financial Benefits System offers an immediate, tangible method for reducing the significant outlays associated with the high cost procedures that will be increasingly required by aging Baby Boomers.

In some implementations consistent with a medical shared savings system and method described herein, a medical shared savings unit calculates a savings based on a difference between the cost of a medical procedure performed in a patient-selected region outside of the United States and the cost of the medical procedure performed within the United States., Additionally, the savings can be calculated based on a cost of the medical procedure performed in any venue selected that is outside the patient's medical plan network, and which cost is less than the cost within the patient's medical plan network. A medical savings plan model divides the savings to attribute a portion of the savings to the patient, or employer, in the form of lower medical premium.

The lower medical premium can be a discount from an established medical premium established by an insurer for the patient/employee for the patient's medical plan network under the patient's medical insurance plan. The lower medical premiums can also be a rebate of money to the patient or to the employer according to the medical savings plan model and/or based on the savings. The difference in cost between the lower medical premiums and the established medical premiums can be a fixed amount or a variable amount. The variable amount can be based on the amount of the savings, a number of times employees of the employer selects a medical procedure to be performed outside of their medical plan network (i.e. outside of the United States), the type of procedure(s) performed, or any other variable used by the medical savings plan model or calculated by the medical shared savings unit.

In yet other implementations, the lower medical premiums can represent a payment and/or rebate to an employer of the patient, as further incentive for the patient to select a lower-cost medical procedure.

In an exemplary implementation, a medical shared savings system includes a data store that stores medical plan information for a medical plan associated with a patient and an employer. The medical plan information includes pricing data for a medical procedure for each of a number of medical providers in a medical plan network associated with the medical plan. The medical providers includes at least one medical provider in a region outside of the fifty United States, which region outside the fifty United States can also include American territories, foreign countries and territories, and other regions. The medical plan has an associated established medical premium to be paid to an insurer.

A medical shared savings unit is connected with the data store and interacts with one or more computing devices via a communications network. The medical shared savings unit receives a selection from one of the one or more computing devices to select a medical provider in a region outside of the United States for a patient as part of a medical savings plan associated with the medical plan. The medical shared savings unit accesses the medical plan information from the data store, and calculates a savings based on a difference between a cost of the medical procedure performed in the region outside of the United States and a cost of the medical procedure performed within the United States. The medical shared savings unit further divides the savings between the insurer and the employer based on a medical savings plan model when the patient undergoes the medical procedure in the region outside of the United States, the savings being in the form of a lower medical premium that is lower than the established medical premium.

One or more aspects or features of the subject matter described herein can be realized in digital electronic circuitry, integrated circuitry, specially designed application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) computer hardware, firmware, software, and/or combinations thereof. These various aspects or features can include implementation in one or more computer programs that are executable and/or interpretable on a programmable system including at least one programmable processor, which can be special or general purpose, coupled to receive data and instructions from, and to transmit data and instructions to, a storage system, at least one input device, and at least one output device. The programmable system or computing system may include clients and servers. A client and server are generally remote from each other and typically interact through a communication network. The relationship of client and server arises by virtue of computer programs running on the respective computers and having a client-server relationship to each other.

These computer programs, which can also be referred to as programs, software, software applications, applications, components, or code, include machine instructions for a programmable processor, and can be implemented in a high-level procedural and/or object-oriented programming language, and/or in assembly/machine language. As used herein, the term “machine-readable medium” refers to any computer program product, apparatus and/or device, such as for example magnetic discs, optical disks, memory, and Programmable Logic Devices (PLDs), used to provide machine instructions and/or data to a programmable processor, including a machine-readable medium that receives machine instructions as a machine-readable signal. The term “machine-readable signal” refers to any signal used to provide machine instructions and/or data to a programmable processor. The machine-readable medium can store such machine instructions non-transitorily, such as for example as would a non-transient solid-state memory or a magnetic hard drive or any equivalent storage medium. The machine-readable medium can alternatively or additionally store such machine instructions in a transient manner, such as for example as would a processor cache or other random access memory associated with one or more physical processor cores.

To provide for interaction with a user, one or more aspects or features of the subject matter described herein can be implemented on a computer having a display device, such as for example a cathode ray tube (CRT) or a liquid crystal display (LCD) or a light emitting diode (LED) monitor for displaying information to the user and a keyboard and a pointing device, such as for example a mouse or a trackball, by which the user may provide input to the computer. Other kinds of devices can be used to provide for interaction with a user as well. For example, feedback provided to the user can be any form of sensory feedback, such as for example visual feedback, auditory feedback, or tactile feedback; and input from the user may be received in any form, including, but not limited to, acoustic, speech, or tactile input. Other possible input devices include, but are not limited to, touch screens or other touch-sensitive devices such as single or multi-point resistive or capacitive trackpads, voice recognition hardware and software, optical scanners, optical pointers, digital image capture devices and associated interpretation software, and the like.

The subject matter described herein can be embodied in systems, apparatus, methods, and/or articles depending on the desired configuration. The implementations set forth in the foregoing description do not represent all implementations consistent with the subject matter described herein. Instead, they are merely some examples consistent with aspects related to the described subject matter. Although a few variations have been described in detail above, other modifications or additions are possible. In particular, further features and/or variations can be provided in addition to those set forth herein. For example, the implementations described above can be directed to various combinations and subcombinations of the disclosed features and/or combinations and subcombinations of several further features disclosed above. In addition, the logic flows depicted in the accompanying figures and/or described herein do not necessarily require the particular order shown, or sequential order, to achieve desirable results. Other implementations may be within the scope of the following claims. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A medical shared savings system, comprising: a data store that stores medical plan information for a medical plan associated with a patient and an employer, the medical plan information including pricing data for a medical procedure for each of a plurality of medical providers in a medical plan network associated with the medical plan, the plurality of medical providers including at least one medical provider in a region outside of the United States, the medical plan having an associated established medical premium to be paid to an insurer; and a medical shared savings unit connected with the data store and interacting with one or more computing devices via a communications network, the medical shared savings unit receiving a selection from one of the one or more computing devices to select the at least one medical provider in a region outside of the United States for a patient as part of a medical savings plan associated with the medical plan, accessing the medical plan information from the data store, and calculating a savings based on a difference between a cost of the medical procedure performed in the region outside of the United States and a cost of the medical procedure performed within the United States, the medical shared savings unit further dividing the savings between the insurer and the employer based on a medical savings plan model when the patient undergoes the medical procedure in the region outside of the United States, the savings being in the form of a lower medical premium that is lower than the established medical premium.
 2. The medical shared savings system in accordance with claim 1, wherein the pricing data includes travel costs.
 3. The medical shared savings system in accordance with claim 1, wherein the medical shared savings unit further divides the savings with the patient based on the medical savings plan model.
 4. The medical shared savings system in accordance with claim 1, wherein the medical shared savings unit divides the savings at an unequal percentage of the savings based on the medical savings plan model.
 5. The medical shared savings system in accordance with claim 1, wherein the pricing data includes costs for post-operative services related to the medical procedure.
 6. The medical shared savings system in accordance with claim 1, wherein the pricing data includes costs for ongoing prescriptions related to the medical procedure.
 7. A medical shared savings system, comprising: a data store that stores medical plan information for a medical plan associated with an employer, the medical plan information including pricing data for a medical procedure for each of a plurality of medical providers in a medical plan network associated with the medical plan, the plurality of medical providers including at least one medical provider in a region outside of the United States, the medical, plan having an established medical premium to be paid to an insurer on behalf of a patient associated with the employer; and a medical shared savings unit connected with the data store and interacting with one or more computing devices via a communications network, the medical shared savings unit receiving a selection from one of the one or more computing devices to select the medical procedure in a patient-selected region outside of the United States as part of a medical savings plan associated with the medical plan, accessing the medical plan information from the data store, and calculating a savings based on a difference between a cost of the medical procedure performed in the patient-selected region outside of the United States and a cost of the medical procedure performed within the United States, the medical shared savings unit further dividing the savings between the insurer and the employer based on a medical savings plan model when a patient undergoes the medical procedure in the patient-selected region outside of the United States, the savings being in the form of a lower medical premium to be paid to the insurer that is lower than the established medical premium.
 8. The medical shared savings system in accordance with claim 7, wherein the pricing data includes travel costs.
 9. The medical shared savings system in accordance with claim 7, wherein the medical shared savings unit further divides the savings with the patient based on the medical savings plan model.
 10. The medical shared savings system in accordance with claim 7, wherein the medical shared savings unit divides the savings at an unequal percentage of the savings based on the medical savings plan model.
 11. The medical shared savings system in accordance with claim 7, wherein the pricing data includes costs for post-operative services related to the medical procedure.
 12. The medical shared savings system in accordance with claim 7, wherein the pricing data includes costs for ongoing prescriptions related to the medical procedure.
 13. A computer-implemented method comprising: storing, in a data store, medical plan information for a medical plan associated with an employer, the medical plan information including pricing data for a medical procedure for each of a plurality of medical providers in a medical plan network associated with the medical plan, the plurality of medical providers including at least one medical provider in a region outside of the United States, the medical plan having an established medical premium to be paid to an insurer on behalf of a patient associated with the employer; receiving, by a computer via a communications network, a selection from a computing device to select the at least one medical provider in a region outside of the United States for a patient as part of a medical savings plan associated with the medical plan; accessing, by the computer, the medical plan information from the data store; calculating, by the computer, a savings based on a difference between a cost of the medical procedure performed in the patient-selected region outside of the United States and a cost of the medical procedure performed within the United States; dividing, by the computer, the savings between the insurer and the employer based on a medical savings plan model when a patient undergoes the medical procedure in the patient-selected region outside of the United States, the savings being in the form of a lower medical premium to be paid to the insurer that is lower than the established medical premium.
 14. The computer-implemented method in accordance with claim 13, wherein the computing device is one of a mobile device or desktop computer.
 15. The computer-implemented method in accordance with claim 13, wherein the pricing data includes travel costs.
 16. The computer-implemented method in accordance with claim 13, further comprising dividing the savings with the patient based on the medical savings plan model.
 17. The computer-implemented method in accordance with claim 13, further comprising dividing, by the computer, the savings at an unequal percentage of the savings based on the medical savings plan model.
 18. The computer-implemented method in accordance with claim 13, wherein the pricing data includes costs for post-operative services related to the medical procedure.
 19. The computer-implemented method in accordance with claim 13, wherein the pricing data includes costs for ongoing prescriptions related to the medical procedure. 